Albany – October 14, 2026 -- Trenchless drilling can cost more upfront than traditional excavation, but savings often follow from reduced labor, shorter timelines and less restoration work, according to a HelloNation article featuring David Allegretta of JAT Construction in Albany, N.Y.
Open trenches disrupt roads, sidewalks and nearby infrastructure
Traditional excavation relies on open trenches to reach pipes and cables. The article says the method works but can delay active projects and add costs. It remains suitable for simpler jobs or sites with fewer surface constraints, where it can be cost-effective.
Trenchless methods keep traffic and businesses moving above ground
Trenchless drilling uses specialized equipment to create underground pathways without large trenches. The article identifies three techniques: horizontal directional drilling, pipe bursting and microtunneling. Horizontal directional drilling installs pipelines and cables beneath obstacles, while pipe bursting replaces aging infrastructure.
The article says the approach suits dense areas with heavy vehicle and pedestrian traffic, and it cites the Hudson Valley, the Capital Region, and Upstate, Central and Western New York.
Controlled drilling lowers the risk of striking existing utilities
Traditional excavation carries a higher risk of accidentally damaging other lines, which can cause delays and added repairs. Controlled drilling lets contractors work around complex underground systems with greater precision and less surface damage.
Reduced soil disturbance adds an environmental benefit
Trenchless drilling disturbs less soil and preserves existing landscapes. The article links this to growing expectations for sustainable infrastructure practices.
The article concludes that the choice between the two methods depends on project needs, location and budget.